In our increasingly service and knowledge based economy, the older worker may have an advantage. As reported on NPR, it turns out that the brain peaks in middle age, seeing the bigger picture more rapidly, increasing processing speed with increased "white matter" (a fatty substance coating the usual grey matter), and increased problem solving -- all in the older brain.
As reported by Barbara Strauch in her book The Secret Life of the Grown Up Brain, some stereotypical age-related symptoms do occur, such as forgetfulness, but these are not necessarily as bad as they seem, and can be combated by challenging the brain every day, preferably through real intellectual rigor, such as making a cogent argument to an intellectual adversary (makes me glad I'm a lawyer).
So, employers are bound by the stick presented by the ADA and the ADEA (outlawing age discrimination in employment), but are may find that hiring and retaining older workers is better for the bottom line.
Showing posts with label employment decisions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employment decisions. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Friday, March 12, 2010
Occam's Razor
Vital to understanding employee's complaints and the extent of protection afforded by the law is the ability to think critically about the issues. When presented with employee complaints, witness reports, and employment records, it can be difficult to cut through the volume of material and hone in on the important issues. Even when the allegedly harmed employee is completely honest, emotions can often lead to erroneous conclusions -- there are as many ways to thwart logic as there are to support it.
For this reason, employers need a ready logical toolkit to parse the conjectural from the relevant. Almost like a crime-scene, the fresher the facts, the easier it is to find the smoking gun.
The first tool in the logical toolkit is Occam's Razor:
In the context of factual investigations, this principle is essentially one of economy. When asked for the "facts" of events they witnessed, people often embellish, explain, or remember things as they think they ought to have been. A good interviewer can, through questioning, focus on the actual complaint made, and eliminate non sequiturs. This is Occam's Razor at work: finding the correct (i.e. simplest) conclusion by building up a profile of the event in question.
As part of my practice, I regularly interview witnesses -- both adverse and friendly, both informally and under oath -- in employment discrimination, wage-and-hour, and trust fund contributions cases, as well as toward best employment practices.
For this reason, employers need a ready logical toolkit to parse the conjectural from the relevant. Almost like a crime-scene, the fresher the facts, the easier it is to find the smoking gun.
The first tool in the logical toolkit is Occam's Razor:
The simplest conclusion is that most likely true.In Latin, William of Ockham wrote: pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate, "plurality should not be posited without necessity," though it has been rewritten many ways.
In the context of factual investigations, this principle is essentially one of economy. When asked for the "facts" of events they witnessed, people often embellish, explain, or remember things as they think they ought to have been. A good interviewer can, through questioning, focus on the actual complaint made, and eliminate non sequiturs. This is Occam's Razor at work: finding the correct (i.e. simplest) conclusion by building up a profile of the event in question.
As part of my practice, I regularly interview witnesses -- both adverse and friendly, both informally and under oath -- in employment discrimination, wage-and-hour, and trust fund contributions cases, as well as toward best employment practices.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)